
@article {160479,
	title = {Global selection on insect antipredator coloration.},
	journal = {Science},
	volume = {389},
	year = {2025},
	month = {2025 Sep 25},
	pages = {1336-1341},
	abstract = {<p>Natural selection has repeatedly led to the evolution of two alternative antipredator color strategies-camouflage to avoid detection and aposematism to advertise unprofitability-but we lack understanding of how ecological context favors one strategy over the other. We conducted a globally replicated predation experiment at 21 sites on six continents to test how predator community, prey community, and visual environment influenced the predation risk of 15,018 artificial paper "moth" prey with cryptic or warning coloration. Results indicated that aposematic strategies fare better in environments with low predation intensity, whereas camouflage strategies are advantaged when other camouflaged prey species are rare and when light levels are low. This study demonstrates how multiple mechanisms shape antipredator strategies, helping to explain the evolution and global distribution of camouflaged and aposematic animals.</p>
},
	keywords = {Animals, Biological Evolution, Biological Mimicry, Color, Ecosystem, Insecta, Pigmentation, Predatory Behavior, Selection, Genetic},
	issn = {1095-9203},
	doi = {10.1126/science.adr7368},
	author = {Medina, Iliana and Exnerov{\'a}, Alice and Da{\v n}kov{\'a}, Kl{\'a}ra and Penacchio, Olivier and Sherratt, Tom N and Albrecht, Tom{\'a}{\v s} and Baidya, Sarika and Bosque, Renan Janke and Brown, H{\'e}lo{\"\i}se and Burdfield-Steel, Emily and Cain, Kristal E and Cez{\'a}rio, Rodrigo Roucourt and Chiari, Ylenia and Esquivel, Carolina and Ferreira, Rhainer Guillermo and Franklin, Amanda M and Garvey, Aloise and Guchu, Samuel and Hastings, Brandon T and Hotov{\'a}-Sv{\'a}dov{\'a}, Kate{\v r}ina and Hwang, Yerin and Kang, Changku and Kasaya, John and Kelley, Jennifer and Kim, Yongsu and Kunte, Krushnamegh and Daetto-Liberato, Felipe and Loeffler-Henry, Karl and Lopez, Vinicius Marques and MacKay-Dietrich, Claire and Mappes, Johanna and De M{\'a}rsico, Mar{\'\i}a Cecilia and Nawge, Viraj and Njoroge, Peter and Nokelainen, Ossi and Pal, Arka and Paul, Archan and Posont, Robert and Ra{\v s}ka, Jan and Reboreda, Juan Carlos and Rojas Ripari, Juan Manuel and Rowland, Hannah M and Sabio, Maria de Las Nieves and Salazar, Camilo and Salgado-Roa, Fabian C and Stephens-C{\'a}rdenas, Steve A and Szab{\'o}, Anita and Mongui Torres, Juan Pablo and Troscianko, Jolyon and Truhl{\'a}{\v r}ov{\'a}, Marie and Umbers, Kate D L and Venton, Molly and Vitasovich, Makenzie and Wang, Lu-Yi and Weil, Sarah-Sophie and Allen, William L}
}
@article {121923,
	title = {The tempo and mode of character evolution in the assembly of mimetic communities.},
	journal = {Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A},
	volume = {120},
	year = {2023},
	month = {2023 Jan 03},
	pages = {e2203724120},
	abstract = {<p>Multitrait adaptive evolution is shaped by factors such as phylogenetic and functional constraints as well as the intensity and direction of selection. The tempo and mode of such multitrait evolution can differentially impact the assembly of biological communities. Batesian mimicry, in which undefended prey gain a fitness advantage by evolving a resemblance to aposematic models, involves adaptive evolution of multiple traits such as color patterns and flight morphology. To elucidate the evolutionary mechanisms of such multitrait adaptations, we evaluated the tempo and mode of adaptive convergence in flight morphology and color patterns in mimetic butterfly communities. We found that compared with Batesian mimics or nonmimetic sister species, models showed significantly faster rates of aposematic trait evolution, creating adaptive peaks for mimicry. At the community level, the degree of mimetic resemblance between mimics and models was positively correlated with the rate of character evolution, but independent of phylogenetic relatedness. Monomorphic mimics and female-limited mimics converged on the color patterns of models to a similar degree, showing that there were no constraints on mimetic trait evolution with respect to sex-specific selections. Convergence was driven by the greater lability of color patterns, which evolved at significantly faster rates than the phylogenetically conserved flight morphological traits, indicating that the two traits evolve under differential selection pressures and/or functional and genetic constraints. These community-wide patterns show that during the assembly of a community, the tempo of adaptive evolution is nonlinear, and specific to the underlying functional relationships and key traits that define the community.</p>
},
	keywords = {Animals, Biological Evolution, Biological Mimicry, Biota, Butterflies, Excipients, Female, Male, Phylogeny, Predatory Behavior},
	issn = {1091-6490},
	doi = {10.1073/pnas.2203724120},
	author = {Basu, Dipendra Nath and Bhaumik, Vaishali and Kunte, Krushnamegh}
}
